In a landmark agreement that could reshape the military landscape of the Middle East, the United States and Saudi Arabia signed a $142 billion defense sales deal during President Donald Trump’s visit to Riyadh.
The White House heralded the accord as the largest defense cooperation agreement in U.S. history, signaling a deepening strategic partnership aimed at countering regional threats and reinforcing Saudi Arabia’s military capabilities.
The deal, inked amidst a broader $600 billion Saudi investment commitment to the U.S. economy, includes advanced weaponry, training programs, and logistical support, with a focus on enhancing Riyadh’s air, missile, and naval defenses.
This monumental transaction, which unfolded at the Royal Court in Riyadh, underscores Washington’s commitment to its Gulf ally while raising questions about its implications for regional stability.
The agreement was formalized during a ceremony where President Trump and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman shook hands, marking a high point in Trump’s first overseas trip since taking office for his second term.
The White House emphasized that the deal would provide Saudi Arabia with state-of-the-art warfighting equipment, positioning the kingdom to better address threats from Iran and its proxies, such as Yemen’s Houthi rebels.
According to a White House fact sheet, the package spans air and missile defense, space capabilities, naval and coastal security, and military modernization, involving contracts with over a dozen American defense firms, including Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Raytheon, Northrop Grumman, and General Atomics.
The deal also includes extensive training and support services to ensure Saudi forces can effectively operate the new systems. “This agreement strengthens our defense industry, enhances our strategic partnership, and promotes stability in the Gulf region,” the White House stated.
Central to the deal is the sale of MQ-9B SeaGuardian unmanned aerial systems, manufactured by General Atomics, valued at approximately $20 billion. The MQ-9B SeaGuardian is a maritime-focused variant of the Reaper drone, designed for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance [ISR] missions, as well as precision strikes.
With a wingspan of 79 feet and a maximum endurance of over 30 hours, the SeaGuardian can carry up to 5,600 pounds of payload, including advanced sensors and munitions. Its synthetic aperture radar and maritime patrol radar allow it to detect surface vessels over vast ocean areas, while electro-optical and infrared sensors provide high-resolution imagery for targeting.
The drone’s ability to operate at altitudes up to 40,000 feet makes it ideal for monitoring the Persian Gulf, where Saudi Arabia faces threats from Iranian naval forces and Houthi drone attacks. Compared to Iran’s Shahed-136 drones, which are low-cost but limited in range and sophistication, the SeaGuardian offers superior endurance and sensor integration, potentially giving Saudi forces a significant edge in detecting and neutralizing asymmetric threats.
The system’s Hellfire missile compatibility further enhances its strike capabilities, though its reliance on satellite communications could pose vulnerabilities in contested environments.
The deal also includes upgrades to Saudi Arabia’s air and missile defense systems, notably the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense [THAAD] system and the Patriot PAC-3, both produced by Lockheed Martin and Raytheon. THAAD is designed to intercept short-, medium-, and intermediate-range ballistic missiles during their terminal phase, using a hit-to-kill interceptor that destroys targets through kinetic energy.
Each THAAD battery consists of six launchers, 48 interceptors, a radar, and a fire control unit, capable of protecting a wide area against threats like Iran’s Fateh-110 missiles, which have been used by Houthi forces. The Patriot PAC-3, an evolution of the Patriot system, employs advanced radar and interceptors to counter tactical ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, and aircraft.
Its phased-array radar can track up to 100 targets simultaneously, offering a layered defense when paired with THAAD. Saudi Arabia’s existing Patriot systems have been tested in combat, intercepting Houthi missiles and drones, but the kingdom has faced challenges in maintaining high interception rates due to the volume and unpredictability of attacks.
The new systems aim to address these gaps, though integration with Saudi Arabia’s aging air defense network could require significant upgrades to command-and-control infrastructure.
Another key component of the deal is the C-130J Super Hercules transport aircraft, also from Lockheed Martin, tailored for desert operations and logistical support. The C-130J, a modernized version of the venerable C-130, can carry up to 44,000 pounds of cargo or 90 troops, with a range of 2,000 miles.
Its ability to operate from short, unprepared runways makes it well-suited for Saudi Arabia’s vast desert terrain, where rapid troop and equipment deployment is critical. The aircraft’s advanced avionics, including digital displays and enhanced navigation systems, improve reliability in harsh environments.
Saudi Arabia has used earlier C-130 models in Yemen, airlifting supplies and conducting humanitarian missions, but the C-130J’s improved fuel efficiency and payload capacity will enhance these operations.
Compared to Russia’s Il-76, a comparable transport used by some Middle Eastern nations, the C-130J offers better short-field performance and interoperability with NATO-standard equipment, aligning with Saudi Arabia’s push for Western-aligned systems.
Speculation about the inclusion of F-35 stealth fighters in the deal has surfaced, but no confirmation was provided during the announcement. The F-35, developed by Lockheed Martin, is a fifth-generation multirole fighter with advanced stealth, sensor fusion, and network-enabled operations.
Its AN/APG-81 radar and infrared sensors allow it to detect and engage targets at long ranges, while its low-observable design reduces its radar cross-section. Saudi Arabia’s interest in the F-35 stems from its desire to match the capabilities of regional rivals like Israel, which operates the jet, and to counter Iran’s growing air force.
However, U.S. restrictions on exporting sensitive technologies, coupled with commitments to maintain Israel’s qualitative military edge, make an F-35 sale unlikely in the near term. Instead, the deal focuses on upgrading Saudi Arabia’s existing fleet of F-15s and Typhoons, which, while capable, lack the stealth and sensor advantages of the F-35. This limitation highlights the delicate balance the U.S. must strike in arming its Gulf allies without destabilizing the region.
The agreement comes against the backdrop of Saudi Arabia’s ongoing military challenges, particularly in Yemen, where its air campaign against Houthi rebels has exposed vulnerabilities in its defense architecture. Since 2015, Saudi forces have conducted thousands of airstrikes, relying heavily on U.S.-supplied aircraft and munitions.
However, Houthi drone and missile attacks, often backed by Iranian technology, have repeatedly penetrated Saudi defenses, striking oil facilities and military bases. A 2019 attack on Aramco’s Abqaiq and Khurais oil facilities, attributed to Iran, disrupted 5% of the global oil supply, underscoring the kingdom’s need for robust missile defenses.
The new systems, particularly THAAD and the SeaGuardian are expected to bolster Saudi Arabia’s ability to detect and intercept such threats, though their effectiveness will depend on improved training and coordination among Saudi forces.
Historically, U.S.-Saudi defense ties have been a cornerstone of their relationship, dating back to the 1945 meeting between President Franklin D. Roosevelt and King Abdulaziz Al Saud.
During the Cold War, the U.S. supplied Saudi Arabia with F-15 fighters and AWACS aircraft to counter Soviet influence in the region. In 2017, during Trump’s first term, the U.S. announced a $110 billion arms deal with Saudi Arabia, part of a $350 billion, 10-year framework.
That agreement faced criticism for its slow implementation, with many contracts remaining in the planning stage. The current deal, described as more concrete, builds on those efforts but faces similar scrutiny. Congressional approval is required, and lawmakers have raised concerns about Saudi Arabia’s human rights record and its role in Yemen’s humanitarian crisis.
“This proposed sale will support the foreign policy goals and national security objectives of the United States by improving the security of a partner country,” the U.S. Defense Security Cooperation Agency stated in a related announcement earlier this month, though it referred to a smaller $3.5 billion missile sale.
The deal is part of a broader $600 billion Saudi investment pledge to the U.S., covering energy, technology, and infrastructure. Saudi state television reported that the agreements aim to diversify the kingdom’s economy under its Vision 2030 initiative, reducing dependence on oil.
During a Saudi-U.S. investment forum in Riyadh, Trump touted the deal as a cornerstone of his “America First” strategy, predicting it would create jobs and strengthen economic ties. “The first deals under the announcement strengthen our energy security, defense industry, technology leadership, and access to global infrastructure,” the White House said in a statement.
The presence of industry leaders like Aramco CEO Amin Nasser and NEOM Deputy CEO Rayan Fayez at the forum underscored the deal’s economic significance.
Regionally, the agreement could intensify tensions with Iran, which has accelerated its missile and drone programs in response to Western sanctions. Iran’s Fateh-110 and Qiam-1 missiles, with ranges up to 500 miles, pose a direct threat to Saudi infrastructure, while its proxy forces, including the Houthis, have demonstrated growing sophistication in asymmetric warfare.
The U.S. aims to counter this by equipping Saudi Arabia with systems that integrate into a broader missile defense network, potentially linking with U.S. and allied forces in the Gulf. However, the deal risks escalating an arms race, as Iran may seek to match Saudi capabilities, possibly with support from Russia or China.
Compared to China’s HQ-9 air defense system, which Iran has explored, THAAD and Patriot offer superior interception rates but come with higher costs and maintenance demands, potentially straining Saudi Arabia’s defense budget.
The deal also navigates complex U.S. alliances in the region. Israel, a key partner, has expressed concerns about advanced arms sales to Arab states, fearing a dilution of its military edge. The Abraham Accords, brokered by Trump in 2020, normalized ties between Israel and several Gulf states, but Saudi Arabia has conditioned normalization on progress toward a Palestinian state, a prospect complicated by the ongoing conflict in Gaza.
Trump expressed hope that Saudi Arabia would join the accords, but analysts see this as unlikely in the near term. “The war in Gaza denies him one goal he craves: Saudi-Israel normalization,” Reuters reported, citing the kingdom’s stance on a two-state solution.
For Saudi Arabia, the deal represents a step toward military self-reliance, though challenges remain. The kingdom’s armed forces have struggled with interoperability and maintenance of advanced systems, relying heavily on U.S. contractors. The inclusion of training programs in the deal aims to address this, with U.S. personnel expected to assist in integrating the new platforms.
However, Saudi Arabia’s ability to absorb such a large influx of technology will depend on reforms to its military education and doctrine, areas where progress has been uneven. The C-130J’s logistical capabilities, for instance, could streamline operations in Yemen, but only if Saudi crews are adequately trained to exploit its full potential.
From a U.S. perspective, the deal strengthens its strategic foothold in the Gulf, countering China’s growing influence in the region. Saudi Arabia’s earlier flirtations with Chinese weapons, including the DF-21 ballistic missile, raised concerns in Washington about losing a key ally.
By doubling down on American systems, the deal ensures Saudi Arabia remains tethered to U.S. supply chains and standards, limiting its strategic autonomy but enhancing interoperability with U.S. forces.
This aligns with the Pentagon’s push for integrated deterrence, where allied capabilities amplify U.S. power projection. However, the deal’s long-term success hinges on Congressional approval and Saudi Arabia’s ability to translate investments into operational gains.
As the dust settles on this historic agreement, its implications extend beyond the balance sheets of defense contractors. The infusion of advanced weaponry into Saudi Arabia’s arsenal could reshape the Middle East’s security dynamics, offering Riyadh a stronger shield against Iran but also raising the stakes in an already volatile region.
The technical prowess of systems like the MQ-9B SeaGuardian and THAAD is undeniable, yet their impact will depend on Saudi Arabia’s ability to wield them effectively. For the U.S., the deal cements its role as the Gulf’s primary arms supplier, but it also tests Washington’s ability to manage competing alliances and prevent unintended escalation.
Will this partnership usher in a new era of stability, or will it fuel a cycle of rivalry and retribution? Only time will tell, but the answers lie in the deserts of Arabia and the halls of Capitol Hill.
***
Follow us everywhere and at any time. BulgarianMilitary.com has responsive design and you can open the page from any computer, mobile devices or web browsers. For more up-to-date news, follow our Google News, YouTube, Reddit, LinkedIn, and Twitter pages. Our standards: Manifesto & ethical principles.